After more than 40 years of efforts, China has become a big manufacturing country, and the output value of manufacturing industry is the first in the world. In 2014, China's manufacturing output accounted for 29.5% of the world's total, while the US accounted for only 16.4% of the total second of the world's total. Western India's global share accounted for less than 3%. But the biggest problem that our manufacturing industry is facing is the big and not strong, which is mainly manifested in four aspects: the high-end manufacturing capability is weak, the independent innovation ability is not strong, the overall quality and efficiency is not high, and the information level is uneven.

According to the Research Report of the Ministry of engineering and the Ministry of industry and information in 2014, it can be divided into three squares in the world's major manufacturing countries. The United States has the highest comprehensive strength and belongs to the first phalanx. Germany and Japan follow the second phalanx. China is the third phalanx with Korea, France and Britain, and is in the leading position of the third phalanx. According to the prediction of Chinese Academy of engineering, from 2025 to 2035, China's manufacturing industry will enter the second phalanx, and in 2049, it is hopeful to enter the first phalanx, close to the United States and even lead the development of global manufacturing industry.

To promote China's development from manufacturing power to manufacturing power, we must provide corresponding institutional and institutional guarantee. We must give corresponding policy and mechanism environment, and we must have corresponding national strategic guidance and support. In order to promote the overall economic recovery after the financial tsunami, the United States paid great attention to the revitalization of the manufacturing industry from Obama to Trump. Despite the reality of the United States, America's manufacturing industry has been able to top the top of the world, mainly due to the high technology and information technology of the United States. Therefore, the advantages of the us lie in the high-tech industry and the modern financial industry, not the general manufacturing industry, especially the middle and low end manufacturing industries. Therefore, whether the revitalization of manufacturing industry is a reasonable choice is still a lot of controversy even in the US. But there is an undeniable fact that the global proportion of the US manufacturing industry has indeed improved, and the US economy has become the only big country in western countries that has maintained a good growth momentum in recent years in the two US government's push. In this respect, it is clear that the United States has provided inspiration and reference for all countries. More Than This。 If Trump's US priorities go hard in the manufacturing field, it will also have a great impact on the global manufacturing industry, and will have a great impact on the world's major manufacturing countries including China. It even triggered a reshuffle and restructuring of the global manufacturing industry.

In addition to the US reinvigorate the impact and competition of the manufacturing industry, China's efforts to push the manufacturing power into a manufacturing power are still facing three challenges:
First, how to deal with the transfer of the manufacturing industry after the demographic dividend is basically disappearing;

Two, in the case of the spread of populism and the rise of trade protection in the western countries, how to deal with the impact of the export decline on the related manufacturing enterprises;

Three, in the non entity economy, especially in the real estate and financial industry or even in the circulation sector, the profit level is much higher than that in the manufacturing industry. International experience shows that if we can not prevent the real economy from being real and virtual, we will probably fall into the hollowing of the whole industry and ultimately lead to the decline of the economy.
Responding to the above three challenges, including coping with the US's reinvigorate the manufacturing industry, all of them require the government and the society to provide multi angle and all-round safeguards and measures.

 Thisguarantee and measures should include at least three aspects:
First, the macro level, the state must have a corresponding strong strategic direction, which is general secretary Xi Jinping's central spirit and national strategy after listening to the representative of Shandong.

Two is the enterprise level, the state must provide the corresponding policy environment and mechanism guarantee. It includes protecting the business environment of manufacturing enterprises, solving the problem of heavy burden of manufacturing enterprises, and supporting policies for manufacturing enterprises' R & D costs. In this respect, the continued deepening of the structural reform of the supply side and the implementation of the strategy of opening to the outside world will bring positive results.

The three is to give the corresponding policy support and mechanism guarantee in the supply of labor force. It includes the entry mechanism of labor force, the training mechanism of labor force and the mechanism of labor transfer. In addition, reforming the discipline setting of higher education, strengthening secondary skills education and guiding public opinion culture should also be integrated into the overall strategy of manufacturing power.

Obviously, the only way to do the general secretary Xi Jinping had hoped, intentnesses of enterprise industry, climb to the top, to become a successful business. Only in this way can China's economy be able to avoid the hollowing of the industry on the whole, and China's manufacturing industry can have strong international competitiveness.